> > Oh, and I like your new filesystem, but where do you propose that it be > > mounted? > > I don't have any good candidates in mind. In our development > environment, we're mounting it in /ipath, but that doesn't seem like a > good long-term name. Do you have any suggestions? Actually, I've been mounting it on /ipathfs. Not that the difference is terribly important. But if you do have suggestions on where this kind of thing should go, I'd love to hear it. Regards, Robert. -- Robert Walsh Email: [email protected] PathScale, Inc. Phone: +1 650 934 8117 2071 Stierlin Court, Suite 200 Fax: +1 650 428 1969 Mountain View, CA 94043.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- References:
- [PATCH 0 of 18] [RFC] ipath - almost-final round of patches for submission
- From: "Bryan O'Sullivan" <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 8 of 18] ipath - sysfs and ipathfs support for core driver
- From: "Bryan O'Sullivan" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 8 of 18] ipath - sysfs and ipathfs support for core driver
- From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 8 of 18] ipath - sysfs and ipathfs support for core driver
- From: "Bryan O'Sullivan" <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 0 of 18] [RFC] ipath - almost-final round of patches for submission
- Prev by Date: [PATCH] synclink remove dead code
- Next by Date: [RFC][PATCH 6/10] 64 bit resources drivers pcmcia changes
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 8 of 18] ipath - sysfs and ipathfs support for core driver
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 8 of 18] ipath - sysfs and ipathfs support for core driver
- Index(es):
 |