On Thu, 2006-03-23 at 13:48 +0100, Roman Zippel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 22 Mar 2006, john stultz wrote:
>
> > Andrew, All,
> > Here is an updated version of the smaller, reworked and
> > improved patchset I mailed out monday. Please consider for inclusion
> > into your tree.
>
> It looks pretty good already. :)
</me rubs his eyes and reads that again>
> Give me a bit of time to rework the middle part a bit and if we can agree
> to make the new gettimeofday functions optional for an arch, IMO it would
> be ok for 2.6.17.
? The new gettimeofday functions are optional. Don't enable
CONFIG_GENERIC_TIME and you're good to go. Could you clarify what you
mean?
> I think the important part is to get the generic clock
> infrastructure merged, so it can be used by other kernel parts, the
> unification of performance sensitive parts can still be done on top of it
> a bit later.
Ok, I'm still not sure how you intend to you the clocksource bits
outside of timekeeping, but I'm interested in hearing about it.
thanks
-john
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
