Con Kolivas writes:
Nick Piggin writes:Secondly, with or without swap prefetch, I think we can do a better job of handling these use-once patterns to begin with.Absolutely! But there will always be workloads that cause appropriate use-once swapping. Qemu, games, big print jobs, big open documents, big graphic edits and so on.
I meant appropriate and/or use-once. Cheers, Con
Attachment:
pgpmYD9qzTGGz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- References:
- -mm merge plans
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- swap prefetching merge plans
- From: Con Kolivas <[email protected]>
- Re: [ck] swap prefetching merge plans
- From: jos poortvliet <[email protected]>
- Re: [ck] swap prefetching merge plans
- From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
- Re: [ck] swap prefetching merge plans
- From: Con Kolivas <[email protected]>
- -mm merge plans
- Prev by Date: Re: [RFC, PATCH 5/24] i386 Vmi code patching
- Next by Date: Re: [RFC PATCH 35/35] Add Xen virtual block device driver.
- Previous by thread: Re: [ck] swap prefetching merge plans
- Next by thread: Re: [ck] swap prefetching merge plans
- Index(es):