Re: [ck] swap prefetching merge plans

Con Kolivas writes:

Nick Piggin writes:

Secondly, with or without swap prefetch, I think we can do a better job of
handling these use-once patterns to begin with.

Absolutely! But there will always be workloads that cause appropriate use-once swapping. Qemu, games, big print jobs, big open documents, big graphic edits and so on.

I meant appropriate and/or use-once.

Cheers,
Con

Attachment: pgpmYD9qzTGGz.pgp
Description: PGP signature

---

• References:
  • -mm merge plans
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • swap prefetching merge plans
    • From: Con Kolivas <[email protected]>
  • Re: [ck] swap prefetching merge plans
    • From: jos poortvliet <[email protected]>
  • Re: [ck] swap prefetching merge plans
    • From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
  • Re: [ck] swap prefetching merge plans
    • From: Con Kolivas <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [RFC, PATCH 5/24] i386 Vmi code patching
• Next by Date: Re: [RFC PATCH 35/35] Add Xen virtual block device driver.
• Previous by thread: Re: [ck] swap prefetching merge plans
• Next by thread: Re: [ck] swap prefetching merge plans
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]