On Thu, 2006-03-23 at 08:41 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > Could you please explain why is this useful? Users could not care less - they > never have to touch an SMA. We have customers who use our driver who do not want a full IB stack present, for example in embedded environments. <b - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 9 of 18] ipath - char devices for diagnostics and lightweight subnet management
- From: Roland Dreier <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 9 of 18] ipath - char devices for diagnostics and lightweight subnet management
- From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 9 of 18] ipath - char devices for diagnostics and lightweight subnet management
- References:
- [PATCH 0 of 18] [RFC] ipath - almost-final round of patches for submission
- From: "Bryan O'Sullivan" <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 9 of 18] ipath - char devices for diagnostics and lightweight subnet management
- From: "Bryan O'Sullivan" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 9 of 18] ipath - char devices for diagnostics and lightweight subnet management
- From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 0 of 18] [RFC] ipath - almost-final round of patches for submission
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 8 of 18] ipath - sysfs and ipathfs support for core driver
- Next by Date: [PATCH] kexec: grammar fix for crash_save_this_cpu()
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 9 of 18] ipath - char devices for diagnostics and lightweight subnet management
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 9 of 18] ipath - char devices for diagnostics and lightweight subnet management
- Index(es):
 |