Re: [RFC, PATCH 1/24] i386 Vmi documentation II

> There was one other point I wanted to make but I forgot it now @)

Ah yes the point was that since most of the implementations of the hypercalls
likely need fast access to some per CPU state. How would you plan
to implement that? Should it be covered in the specification?

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [RFC, PATCH 1/24] i386 Vmi documentation II
    • From: Zachary Amsden <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC, PATCH 1/24] i386 Vmi documentation II
    • From: Daniel Arai <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: [RFC, PATCH 1/24] i386 Vmi documentation
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] i386: run BIOS PCI detection before direct
• Next by Date: Re: [RFC, PATCH 1/24] i386 Vmi documentation
• Previous by thread: Re: [RFC, PATCH 1/24] i386 Vmi documentation
• Next by thread: Re: [RFC, PATCH 1/24] i386 Vmi documentation II
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]