On Monday 13 March 2006 19:02, Zachary Amsden wrote:
> The VMI ROM detection and code patching mechanism is illustrated in
> setup.c. There ROM is a binary block published by the hypervisor, and
> and there are certainly implications of this. ROMs certainly have a
> history of being proprietary, very differently licensed pieces of
> software, and mostly under non-free licenses. Before jumping to the
> conclusion that this is a bad thing, let us consider more carefully
> why hiding the interface layer to the hypervisor is actually a good
> thing.
How about you fix all these issues you describe here first
and then submit it again?
The disassembly stuff indeed doesn't look like something
that belongs in the kernel.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]