Re: PATCH][1/8] 2.6.15 mlock: make_pages_wired/unwired

Right, it made confusions.

I will correct it.

2006/3/22, Nick Piggin <[email protected]>:
> Stone Wang wrote:
> > 2006/3/21, Nick Piggin <[email protected]>:
>
> >
> > We didnt wire them.
> >
>
> But your comment said they were wired.
>
> --
> SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
> Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
>
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • PATCH][1/8] 2.6.15 mlock: make_pages_wired/unwired
    • From: "Stone Wang" <[email protected]>
  • Re: PATCH][1/8] 2.6.15 mlock: make_pages_wired/unwired
    • From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
  • Re: PATCH][1/8] 2.6.15 mlock: make_pages_wired/unwired
    • From: "Stone Wang" <[email protected]>
  • Re: PATCH][1/8] 2.6.15 mlock: make_pages_wired/unwired
    • From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
  • Re: PATCH][1/8] 2.6.15 mlock: make_pages_wired/unwired
    • From: "Stone Wang" <[email protected]>
  • Re: PATCH][1/8] 2.6.15 mlock: make_pages_wired/unwired
    • From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] possible scheduler deadlock in 2.6.16
• Next by Date: Re: [RFC PATCH 30/35] Add generic_page_range() function
• Previous by thread: Re: PATCH][1/8] 2.6.15 mlock: make_pages_wired/unwired
• Next by thread: [PATCH][2/8] mm: Posix mlock series system calls
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]