Re: [RFC PATCH 04/35] Hypervisor interface header files.

On Wed, 2006-03-22 at 09:31 +0000, Keir Fraser wrote:
> On 22 Mar 2006, at 08:28, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> 
> >> + * This file may be distributed separately from the Linux kernel, or
> >> + * incorporated into other software packages, subject to the 
> >> following license:
> >> + *
> >
> > and what, if any, is the license when distributed with the kernel, as
> > you propose? Right now there doesn't seem to be any at all, and thus it
> > would be undistributable.
> 
> I thought GPLv2 would be implicit.

implicit license == bad :)




-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [RFC PATCH 00/35] Xen i386 paravirtualization support
    • From: Chris Wright <[email protected]>
  • [RFC PATCH 04/35] Hypervisor interface header files.
    • From: Chris Wright <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC PATCH 04/35] Hypervisor interface header files.
    • From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC PATCH 04/35] Hypervisor interface header files.
    • From: Keir Fraser <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [rfc] separate sharpsl_pm initialization from sysfs code
• Next by Date: [patch 1/4 MKII] cpufreq_conservative: aligning of codebase with ondemand
• Previous by thread: Re: [RFC PATCH 04/35] Hypervisor interface header files.
• Next by thread: RE: [RFC PATCH 04/35] Hypervisor interface header files.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]