Re: [PATCH] Add SA_PERCPU_IRQ flag support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 21 Mar 2006, Andrew Morton wrote:

> hm.  Last time around I pointed out that we should be checking that all
> handlers for this IRQ agree about the percpuness.  What happened to
> that?

Maybe simply add this patch on top?

Index: linux-2.6.16-rc6-mm2/kernel/irq/manage.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.16-rc6-mm2.orig/kernel/irq/manage.c	2006-03-21 15:41:26.000000000 -0800
+++ linux-2.6.16-rc6-mm2/kernel/irq/manage.c	2006-03-21 15:43:15.000000000 -0800
@@ -204,6 +204,8 @@ int setup_irq(unsigned int irq, struct i
 #if defined(ARCH_HAS_IRQ_PER_CPU) && defined(SA_PERCPU_IRQ)
 	if (new->flags & SA_PERCPU_IRQ)
 		desc->status |= IRQ_PER_CPU;
+	else
+		BUG_ON(desc->status & IRQ_PER_CPU);
 #endif
 	p = &desc->action;
 	if ((old = *p) != NULL) {
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux