Re: gettimeofday order of magnitude slower with pmtimer, which is default

[john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>]

On Tue, 2006-03-21 at 10:26 +0900, OGAWA Hirofumi wrote:
> Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org> writes:
> 
> > On Tuesday 21 March 2006 01:50, Andreas Mohr wrote:
> >
> >> I think it's crazy to do a safe tripled readout (with *very* expensive
> >> I/O!) of the PM timer unconditionally on *all* systems when only a
> >> (albeit not that small) subset of systems is affected by buggy (un-latched)
> >> PM timers.
> >> I want to improve things there; I can see three ways to do it:
> >> a) maintain a blacklist (or probably better a whitelist) of systems that
> >>    are (not) affected
> >> b) detect long-time timer accuracy, then switch to fast readout if timer
> >>    is verified to be accurate (no white/blacklist needed this way)
> >> c) give up on PM timer completely
> >>
> >> Any comments on which way and how this could/should be done?
> >
> > The pm timer is very fast when the timer is latched and that strange loop uses 
> > hardly any cpu time. The same can't be said about the unlatched timer case 
> > where absurd amounts of cpu seem the norm. You have a catch 22 situation if 
> > you depend on the accuracy of the pm timer only to end up wasting time trying 
> > to actually use that timer. 
[snip]
> And the following is test of gettimeofday(). Probably, we need a patch. Umm....
> 
> 2.6.16 (pmtmr)
> Simple gettimeofday: 3.6532 microseconds
> Simple gettimeofday: 3.6502 microseconds
> Simple gettimeofday: 3.6522 microseconds
> Simple gettimeofday: 3.6486 microseconds
> Simple gettimeofday: 3.6539 microseconds
> 
> 2.6.16+patch (pmtmr)
> Simple gettimeofday: 1.4582 microseconds
> Simple gettimeofday: 1.4593 microseconds
> Simple gettimeofday: 1.4671 microseconds
> Simple gettimeofday: 1.4650 microseconds
> 
> 2.6.16 (tsc)
> Simple gettimeofday: 0.4037 microseconds
> Simple gettimeofday: 0.4037 microseconds
> Simple gettimeofday: 0.4040 microseconds
> Simple gettimeofday: 0.4037 microseconds
> Simple gettimeofday: 0.4038 microseconds
> -- 
> OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>
> 
> 
> Signed-off-by: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>

In my TOD rework I've dropped the triple read, figuring if a problem
arose we could blacklist the specific box. This patch covers that, so it
looks like a good idea to me.

I've not tested it myself, but if you feel good about it, please send it
to Andrew.

thanks
-john

Acked-by: John Stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>

> ---
> 
>  arch/i386/kernel/timers/timer_pm.c |   74 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 60 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff -puN arch/i386/kernel/timers/timer_pm.c~pm-kill-workaround arch/i386/kernel/timers/timer_pm.c
> --- linux-2.6/arch/i386/kernel/timers/timer_pm.c~pm-kill-workaround	2006-03-21 04:20:27.000000000 +0900
> +++ linux-2.6-hirofumi/arch/i386/kernel/timers/timer_pm.c	2006-03-21 04:31:48.000000000 +0900
> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
>  #include <linux/module.h>
>  #include <linux/device.h>
>  #include <linux/init.h>
> +#include <linux/pci.h>
>  #include <asm/types.h>
>  #include <asm/timer.h>
>  #include <asm/smp.h>
> @@ -35,6 +36,7 @@
>   * in arch/i386/acpi/boot.c */
>  u32 pmtmr_ioport = 0;
>  
> +static int pmtmr_need_workaround __read_mostly = 1;
>  
>  /* value of the Power timer at last timer interrupt */
>  static u32 offset_tick;
> @@ -45,24 +47,68 @@ static seqlock_t monotonic_lock = SEQLOC
>  
>  #define ACPI_PM_MASK 0xFFFFFF /* limit it to 24 bits */
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI
> +/*
> + * PIIX4 Errata:
> + *
> + * The power management timer may return improper result when read.
> + * Although the timer value settles properly after incrementing,
> + * while incrementing there is a 3 ns window every 69.8 ns where the
> + * timer value is indeterminate (a 4.2% chance that the data will be
> + * incorrect when read). As a result, the ACPI free running count up
> + * timer specification is violated due to erroneous reads.
> + */
> +static int __init pmtmr_bug_check(void)
> +{
> +	struct pci_dev *dev;
> +	int pmtmr_has_bug = 0;
> +	u8 rev;
> +
> +	dev = pci_get_device(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL,
> +			     PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_82371AB_3, NULL);
> +	if (dev) {
> +		pci_read_config_byte(dev, PCI_REVISION_ID, &rev);
> +		/* the bug has been fixed in PIIX4M */
> +		if (rev < 3)
> +			pmtmr_has_bug = 1;
> +		pci_dev_put(dev);
> +	}
> +
> +	if (pmtmr_has_bug)
> +		printk(KERN_INFO
> +		       "*** Found PM-Timer Bug on this chip. For workarounds a bug, this timer\n"
> +		       "*** source is slow. Use other timer source (clock=).\n");
> +	else
> +		pmtmr_need_workaround = 0;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +device_initcall(pmtmr_bug_check);
> +#endif
> +
>  /*helper function to safely read acpi pm timesource*/
>  static inline u32 read_pmtmr(void)
>  {
> -	u32 v1=0,v2=0,v3=0;
> -	/* It has been reported that because of various broken
> -	 * chipsets (ICH4, PIIX4 and PIIX4E) where the ACPI PM time
> -	 * source is not latched, so you must read it multiple
> -	 * times to insure a safe value is read.
> -	 */
> -	do {
> -		v1 = inl(pmtmr_ioport);
> -		v2 = inl(pmtmr_ioport);
> -		v3 = inl(pmtmr_ioport);
> -	} while ((v1 > v2 && v1 < v3) || (v2 > v3 && v2 < v1)
> -			|| (v3 > v1 && v3 < v2));
> +	if (unlikely(pmtmr_need_workaround)) {
> +		u32 v1, v2, v3;
> +
> +		/* It has been reported that because of various broken
> +		 * chipsets (ICH4, PIIX4 and PIIX4E) where the ACPI PM time
> +		 * source is not latched, so you must read it multiple
> +		 * times to insure a safe value is read.
> +		 */
> +		do {
> +			v1 = inl(pmtmr_ioport);
> +			v2 = inl(pmtmr_ioport);
> +			v3 = inl(pmtmr_ioport);
> +		} while ((v1 > v2 && v1 < v3) || (v2 > v3 && v2 < v1)
> +			 || (v3 > v1 && v3 < v2));
> +
> +		/* mask the output to 24 bits */
> +		return v2 & ACPI_PM_MASK;
> +	}
>  
> -	/* mask the output to 24 bits */
> -	return v2 & ACPI_PM_MASK;
> +	return inl(pmtmr_ioport) & ACPI_PM_MASK;
>  }
>  
> 
> _
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> 

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/