Re: Kernel panic: Route cache, RCU, possibly FIB trie.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dipankar Sarma a écrit :
On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 04:37:19PM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
Jesper Dangaard Brouer a écrit :
There is definitly high memory pressure on this machine!
Slab memory usage, range from 39Mb to 205Mb (at the moment on the production servers).

Did you tried 2.6.16 ?

It contains changes in kernel/rcupdate.c so that not too many RCU elems are queued (force_quiescent_state()). So in the case a rt_cache_flush is done, you have the guarantee all entries are not pushed into rcu at once.

Well, memory pressure or not, the oopses shouldn't be happening :)
Perhaps we should look at them before we work around memory
pressure through the rcu batch tuning stuff in 2.6.16 ?

One of the oopses looked like the rcu callback function pointer getting corrupted indicating that it was double freed or
problem with RCU itself.


Yep, but as this is a production server, I believe its owner might want a fast way to have it back to life :)

And the RCU change in 2.6.16 is definitly a big improvement when a dump of million entries is done :)

If RCU quiescent state is forced, maybe the bug (in the route cache code) will trigger faster ?

Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux