On Tuesday 21 March 2006 19:53, Andreas Mohr wrote: > (and the fact that invoking a function pointer should be similarly > expensive to a conditional) I don't think it's useful. Is *blah(); as expensive as if (conditional) blah(); I don't know the answer. I just know cmp is expensive. Comments? Cheers, Con - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: gettimeofday order of magnitude slower with pmtimer, which is default
- From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
- Re: gettimeofday order of magnitude slower with pmtimer, which is default
- References:
- gettimeofday order of magnitude slower with pmtimer, which is default
- From: bert hubert <bert.hubert@netherlabs.nl>
- Re: gettimeofday order of magnitude slower with pmtimer, which is default
- From: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
- Re: gettimeofday order of magnitude slower with pmtimer, which is default
- From: Andreas Mohr <andi@rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de>
- gettimeofday order of magnitude slower with pmtimer, which is default
- Prev by Date: Re: interactive task starvation
- Next by Date: Re: gettimeofday order of magnitude slower with pmtimer, which is default
- Previous by thread: Re: gettimeofday order of magnitude slower with pmtimer, which is default
- Next by thread: Re: gettimeofday order of magnitude slower with pmtimer, which is default
- Index(es):
 |