Re: gettimeofday order of magnitude slower with pmtimer, which is default

On Tuesday 21 March 2006 19:53, Andreas Mohr wrote:
> (and the fact that invoking a function pointer should be similarly
> expensive to a conditional) I don't think it's useful.

Is 

*blah();

as expensive as

if (conditional)
	blah();

I don't know the answer. I just know cmp is expensive. Comments?

Cheers,
Con
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: gettimeofday order of magnitude slower with pmtimer, which is default
  - From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>

References:
- gettimeofday order of magnitude slower with pmtimer, which is default
  - From: bert hubert <[email protected]>
- Re: gettimeofday order of magnitude slower with pmtimer, which is default
  - From: Con Kolivas <[email protected]>
- Re: gettimeofday order of magnitude slower with pmtimer, which is default
  - From: Andreas Mohr <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: interactive task starvation
Next by Date: Re: gettimeofday order of magnitude slower with pmtimer, which is default
Previous by thread: Re: gettimeofday order of magnitude slower with pmtimer, which is default
Next by thread: Re: gettimeofday order of magnitude slower with pmtimer, which is default
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]