Re: unresolved emu10k1 synth symbols.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



At Tue, 21 Mar 2006 00:46:34 -0500,
Dave Jones wrote:
> 
> I just noticed this whilst booting 2.6.16 on a test box
> 
> snd_emu10k1_synth: Unknown symbol snd_emu10k1_ptr_read
> snd_emu10k1_synth: Unknown symbol snd_emu10k1_synth_copy_from_user
> snd_emu10k1_synth: Unknown symbol snd_emu10k1_voice_free
> snd_emu10k1_synth: Unknown symbol snd_emu10k1_synth_free
> snd_emu10k1_synth: Unknown symbol snd_emu10k1_ptr_write
> snd_emu10k1_synth: Unknown symbol snd_emu10k1_synth_bzero
> snd_emu10k1_synth: Unknown symbol snd_emu10k1_voice_alloc
> snd_emu10k1_synth: Unknown symbol snd_emu10k1_memblk_map
> snd_emu10k1_synth: Unknown symbol snd_emu10k1_synth_alloc
> 
> This kernel was configured with CONFIG_SND_EMU10K1=m
> and CONFIG_SND_SEQUENCER=m
> 
> This looks like it can't possibly work, unless I change
> CONFIG_SND_EMU10K1 to =y.  Is exporting a symbol from one
> module to another actually supposed to work?
> I thought this was why we had the ill-fated intermodule_register() ?.

Weird.  By modprobe, snd-emu10k1 module should be loaded in prior to 
snd-emu10k1-synth because of the dependency of above symbols.

How is snd-emu10k1-synth module loaded?


Takashi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux