> Taking one of your earlier idea, how about the following patch: separating
> out IO completion code from partial IO tracking?
I like that, and I think it closes the lost write error hole. Could we
call it something like io_errno, though? "completion_code" to me sounds
like -ve errno or +ve bytes read.
I think there are still bugs dealing with errors, but I guess we can
tackle them with seperate patches.
- z
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
