* Ingo Oeser ([email protected]) wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Ingo Oeser <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > -int scm_send(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, struct scm_cookie *scm)
> > > -{
> > > - struct task_struct *p = current;
> > > - scm->creds = (struct ucred) {
> > > - .uid = p->uid,
> > > - .gid = p->gid,
> > > - .pid = p->tgid
> > > - };
> > > - scm->fp = NULL;
> > > - scm->sid = security_sk_sid(sock->sk, NULL, 0);
> > > - scm->seq = 0;
> > > - if (msg->msg_controllen <= 0)
> > > - return 0;
> > > - return __scm_send(sock, msg, scm);
> > > -}
> >
> > It's worth noting that scm_send() will call security_sk_sid() even if
> > (msg->msg_controllen <= 0).
>
> Chris, do you know if this is needed in this case?
This whole thing is looking broken. I'm still trying to find the original
patch which caused the series of broken patches on top.
thanks,
-chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
