On Mon, 2006-03-20 at 18:57 +0900, Yasunori Goto wrote: > Current i386's code treats "parent node" in arch_register_node(). > But, IA64 doesn't need it. I'm not sure I understand. What do you mean by "treats"? -- Dave - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH: 017/017]Memory hotplug for new nodes v.4.(arch_register_node() for ia64)
- From: Yasunori Goto <y-goto@jp.fujitsu.com>
- Re: [PATCH: 017/017]Memory hotplug for new nodes v.4.(arch_register_node() for ia64)
- References:
- [PATCH: 017/017]Memory hotplug for new nodes v.4.(arch_register_node() for ia64)
- From: Yasunori Goto <y-goto@jp.fujitsu.com>
- Re: [PATCH: 017/017]Memory hotplug for new nodes v.4.(arch_register_node() for ia64)
- From: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
- Re: [PATCH: 017/017]Memory hotplug for new nodes v.4.(arch_register_node() for ia64)
- From: Yasunori Goto <y-goto@jp.fujitsu.com>
- [PATCH: 017/017]Memory hotplug for new nodes v.4.(arch_register_node() for ia64)
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCHSET] block: fix PIO cache coherency bug
- Next by Date: Re: DoS with POSIX file locks?
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH: 017/017]Memory hotplug for new nodes v.4.(arch_register_node() for ia64)
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH: 017/017]Memory hotplug for new nodes v.4.(arch_register_node() for ia64)
- Index(es):
 |