Re: [PATCH: 017/017]Memory hotplug for new nodes v.4.(arch_register_node() for ia64)

On Mon, 2006-03-20 at 18:57 +0900, Yasunori Goto wrote:
> Current i386's code treats "parent node" in arch_register_node(). 
> But, IA64 doesn't need it.

I'm not sure I understand.  What do you mean by "treats"?

-- Dave

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH: 017/017]Memory hotplug for new nodes v.4.(arch_register_node() for ia64)
  - From: Yasunori Goto <[email protected]>

References:
- [PATCH: 017/017]Memory hotplug for new nodes v.4.(arch_register_node() for ia64)
  - From: Yasunori Goto <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH: 017/017]Memory hotplug for new nodes v.4.(arch_register_node() for ia64)
  - From: Dave Hansen <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH: 017/017]Memory hotplug for new nodes v.4.(arch_register_node() for ia64)
  - From: Yasunori Goto <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCHSET] block: fix PIO cache coherency bug
Next by Date: Re: DoS with POSIX file locks?
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH: 017/017]Memory hotplug for new nodes v.4.(arch_register_node() for ia64)
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH: 017/017]Memory hotplug for new nodes v.4.(arch_register_node() for ia64)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]