Re: [PATCH] Make sure nobody's leaking resources

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 08:53:04AM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> 
> Currently, releasing a resource also releases all of its children.  That
> made sense when request_resource was the main method of dividing up the
> memory map.  With the increased use of insert_resource, it seems to me
> that we should instead reparent the newly orphaned resources.  Before
> we do that, let's make sure that nobody's actually relying on the current
> semantics.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>
> 
> diff -urpNX dontdiff linus-2.6/kernel/resource.c parisc-2.6/kernel/resource.c
> --- linus-2.6/kernel/resource.c	2006-03-20 07:29:06.000000000 -0700
> +++ parisc-2.6/kernel/resource.c	2006-03-20 07:00:47.000000000 -0700
> @@ -181,6 +181,8 @@ static int __release_resource(struct res
>  {
>  	struct resource *tmp, **p;
>  
> +	BUG_ON(old->child);
> +

Is this expressely forbidden at this stage, or just "not recommended"?
if the latter, WARN_ON() might be more appropriate.

Cheers,
Muli
-- 
Muli Ben-Yehuda
http://www.mulix.org | http://mulix.livejournal.com/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux