Re: [PATCH] Add SA_PERCPU_IRQ flag support

On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 01:49:00AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Andrew Morton <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > +#ifdef ARCH_HAS_IRQ_PER_CPU
> >  +	if (new->flags & SA_PERCPU_IRQ)
> >  +		desc->status |= IRQ_PER_CPU;
> >  +#endif
> 
> OK, five architectures define ARCH_HAS_IRQ_PER_CPU but only one of them
> defines SA_PERCPU_IRQ.    Giving up.

Could we do the following (at least for now)?:

+#if defined(ARCH_HAS_IRQ_PER_CPU) && defined(SA_PERCPU_IRQ)
+	if (new->flags & SA_PERCPU_IRQ)
+		desc->status |= IRQ_PER_CPU;
+#endif
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] Add SA_PERCPU_IRQ flag support
    • From: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] Add SA_PERCPU_IRQ flag support
    • From: Dimitri Sivanich <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Add SA_PERCPU_IRQ flag support
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Add SA_PERCPU_IRQ flag support
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [3/3 PATCH] Kprobes: User space probes support- single stepping out-of-line
• Next by Date: Re: [patch] latency-tracing-v2.6.16
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Add SA_PERCPU_IRQ flag support
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Add SA_PERCPU_IRQ flag support
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]