Re: [PATCH]use kzalloc in vfs where appropriate

> > Rewriting the test as:
> > n!=0 && n > INT_MAX / size
> > saves the division because size is much likelier to be a constant, and indeed
> > the code is better:
> >
> >         cmpq    $268435455, %rax
> >         movq    $0, 40(%rsp)
> >         ja      .L313
> >
> > Is there anything I am missing?
> 
> Did you check allyesconfig vmlinux size before and after? If it helps,
> like it probably does, post a patch!

Hi Pekka,

it saves 18K of 232M. I am making a patch.

	Regards
		Oliver
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH]use kzalloc in vfs where appropriate
    • From: Oliver Neukum <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH]use kzalloc in vfs where appropriate
    • From: Oliver Neukum <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH]use kzalloc in vfs where appropriate
    • From: "Pekka Enberg" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: DoS with POSIX file locks?
• Next by Date: RAID5 grow success (was: Re: 2.6.16-rc6-mm2)
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH]use kzalloc in vfs where appropriate
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH]use kzalloc in vfs where appropriate
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]