Re: OOPS: 2.6.16-rc6 cpufreq_conservative

Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Here's another uninlining patch if you want it.
>

Yes, the bitops need that.

We have a 50-patch series against the bitops code queued up.  It's from
Akinobu Mita.  It consolidates of all the C-coded operations which
archtectures are presently duplicating.  In toto:

 80 files changed, 1271 insertions(+), 4999 deletions(-)

It does include uninlining of the hweight functions, although I note that
include/asm-generic/bitops/__ffs.h remains inlined.  I don't know how many
architectures are using the generic code though.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • OOPS: 2.6.16-rc6 cpufreq_conservative
    • From: Parag Warudkar <[email protected]>
  • Re: OOPS: 2.6.16-rc6 cpufreq_conservative
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
  • Re: OOPS: 2.6.16-rc6 cpufreq_conservative
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: OOPS: 2.6.16-rc6 cpufreq_conservative
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
  • Re: OOPS: 2.6.16-rc6 cpufreq_conservative
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
  • Re: OOPS: 2.6.16-rc6 cpufreq_conservative
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
  • Re: OOPS: 2.6.16-rc6 cpufreq_conservative
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
  • Re: OOPS: 2.6.16-rc6 cpufreq_conservative
    • From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
  • Re: OOPS: 2.6.16-rc6 cpufreq_conservative
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
  • Re: OOPS: 2.6.16-rc6 cpufreq_conservative
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
  • Re: OOPS: 2.6.16-rc6 cpufreq_conservative
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: OOPS: 2.6.16-rc6 cpufreq_conservative
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
  • Re: OOPS: 2.6.16-rc6 cpufreq_conservative
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.16-rc6-mm2 - BUG when flushing a ramdisk
• Next by Date: [PATCH] 9p: fix name consistency problems
• Previous by thread: Re: OOPS: 2.6.16-rc6 cpufreq_conservative
• Next by thread: Re: OOPS: 2.6.16-rc6 cpufreq_conservative
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]