Re: [PATCH] fix potential return of uninitialized variable in scsi_scan (resend)

On 3/19/06, James Bottomley <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-03-18 at 22:42 +0100, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> > ( The patch below was already send on March 9, 2006. )
> > ( This is a resend, re-diff'ed against 2.6.16-rc6    )
> >
> >
> > The coverity checker found out that we potentially return sdev uninitialized.
> > This should fix coverity #879
>
> The fix for this is already in scsi-misc.
>
Ok, I was unaware of that.
I'll try to remember to check that git tree in the future.

Thanks.


--
Jesper Juhl <[email protected]>
Don't top-post  http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please      http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH] fix potential return of uninitialized variable in scsi_scan (resend)
  - From: Jesper Juhl <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] fix potential return of uninitialized variable in scsi_scan (resend)
  - From: James Bottomley <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [patch 1/2] Validate itimer timeval from userspace
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] unshare: Cleanup up the sys_unshare interface before we are committed.
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] fix potential return of uninitialized variable in scsi_scan (resend)
Next by thread: [PATCH] fix potential null pointer deref in quota
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]