Re: 2.6.16-rc5: known regressions [TP 600X S3, vanilla DSDT]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


> Please try additional ugly hack
>  5. in acpi_os_queue_for_execution:
>	if(acpi_in_suspend == YES)
>		do nothing.

Am compiling it.  If acpi_in_suspend, I've had it do
return_ACPI_STATUS(AE_BAD_PARAMETER).  Is there a better error code to
use?  I didn't want to use AE_OK, since the caller might think that
the function will be executed eventually, and might do something silly
like wait for it to be executed -- and produce another hang.  I didn't
know, but to be safe I wanted to return an error code.

> Also, please add acpi_debug_layer=0x10 acpi_debug_leve=0x10 boot
> option, then you can observe what methods were executed before
> suspend.

That's in my lilo.conf so all kernels I test use those options.  I can
send you the dmesgs from the suspends without the ugly hack (and will
send them from the upcoming suspends, with the ugly hack).


`Never underestimate the evil of which men of power are capable.'
         --Bertrand Russell, _War Crimes in Vietnam_, chapter 1.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux