Re: [Patch 0/8] Port of -fstack-protector to the kernel

* Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]> wrote:

> This patch series adds support for the gcc 4.1 -fstack-protector 
> feature to the kernel. Unfortunately this needs a gcc patch before it 
> can work, so at this point these patches are just for comment, not for 
> merging.

i think this is a neat feature, and it looks quite unintrusive. Would be 
nice to get the gcc patch merged.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [Patch 0/8] Port of -fstack-protector to the kernel
    • From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [2.6.16-rc6 patch] fix interactive task starvation
• Next by Date: Re: [Patch 2 of 8] annotate the PDA structure with offsets
• Previous by thread: Re: [Patch 0/8] Port of -fstack-protector to the kernel
• Next by thread: removing iptable_nat module problem.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]