Re: [Patch 2 of 8] annotate the PDA structure with offsets

* Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]> wrote:

> Change the comments in the pda structure to make the first fields to 
> have their offset documented (the rest of the fields follows in a 
> later patch) and to have the comments aligned

i think offset 40 should be build-time checked - then you dont have to 
do this annotation.

	Ingo 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [Patch 2 of 8] annotate the PDA structure with offsets
    • From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [Patch 0/8] Port of -fstack-protector to the kernel
    • From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
  • [Patch 2 of 8] annotate the PDA structure with offsets
    • From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH][RFC] mm: swsusp shrink_all_memory tweaks
• Next by Date: Re: [2.6.16-rc6 patch] fix interactive task starvation
• Previous by thread: [Patch 2 of 8] annotate the PDA structure with offsets
• Next by thread: Re: [Patch 2 of 8] annotate the PDA structure with offsets
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]