Re: [2.6.16-rc6 patch] fix interactive task starvation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Andrew Morton <[email protected]> wrote:

> I ended up with the below.
> 
> Which do we think is more likely to be true - batch_task(p) or 
> expired_starving(rq)?  batch_task() looks cheaper to evaluate so I put 
> that first.  But I guess it's less likely to be true.  hmm.

it doesnt really matter - scheduler_tick() is a slowpath. Putting 
batch_task() first is ok.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux