On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 06:22:10PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 11:50:20AM +1100, Nathan Scott wrote: > > Something like this (works OK for me)... > > Is this 2.6.16 material? Its been merged already. cheers. -- Nathan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC] Badness in __mutex_unlock_slowpath with XFS stress tests
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] Badness in __mutex_unlock_slowpath with XFS stress tests
- References:
- [RFC] Badness in __mutex_unlock_slowpath with XFS stress tests
- From: Suzuki <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] Badness in __mutex_unlock_slowpath with XFS stress tests
- From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] Badness in __mutex_unlock_slowpath with XFS stress tests
- From: Nathan Scott <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] Badness in __mutex_unlock_slowpath with XFS stress tests
- From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] Badness in __mutex_unlock_slowpath with XFS stress tests
- From: Nathan Scott <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] Badness in __mutex_unlock_slowpath with XFS stress tests
- From: Nathan Scott <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] Badness in __mutex_unlock_slowpath with XFS stress tests
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- [RFC] Badness in __mutex_unlock_slowpath with XFS stress tests
- Prev by Date: Re: ext3_ordered_writepage() questions
- Next by Date: [PATCH][RFC] mm: swsusp shrink_all_memory tweaks
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC] Badness in __mutex_unlock_slowpath with XFS stress tests
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC] Badness in __mutex_unlock_slowpath with XFS stress tests
- Index(es):
 |