In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 10:25:22 +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> I agree with Zach here, the Xen hypervisor <-> kernel interface is
> not very nice. This proposal seems like a step forward althogh it'll
> probably need to go through a few iterations. Without and actually
> useable opensource hypevisor reference implementation it's totally
> unacceptable, though.
I'd like to see a test harness implementation that has no actual
hypervisor functionality and just implements the VMI calls natively.
This could be used to test the interface and would provide a nice
starting point for those who want to write a VMI hypervisor.
--
Chuck
"Penguins don't come from next door, they come from the Antarctic!"
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
