On Saturday 18 March 2006 00:47, Andreas Mohr wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 12:36:10AM +1100, Con Kolivas wrote:
> > I'm not attached to the style, just the feature. If you think it's
> > warranted I'll change it.
>
> Seconded.
>
> An even nicer way (this solution seems somewhat asymmetric) than
>
> prio_array_t *target = rq->active;
> if (batch_task(p))
> target = rq->expired;
> enqueue_task(p, target);
>
> may be
>
> prio_array_t *target;
> if (batch_task(p))
> target = rq->expired;
> else
> target = rq->active;
> enqueue_task(p, target);
Well I hadn't quite gone to bed so I tried yours for grins too and
interestingly it produced the identical code to my original version.
> But this discussion is clearly growing out of control now ;)
I prefer a month's worth of this over a single more email about
cd-fscking-record's amazing perfection.
Cheers,
Con
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
