Le jeu 16/03/2006 à 19:35, Andreas Dilger a écrit : [...] > Laurent, do your 64-bit patches include support for larger i_blocks? No, I only work on extending the filesystem size. Extending the file size will be the next step... Cheers, Laurent -- Laurent Vivier Bull, Architect of an Open World (TM) http://www.bullopensource.org/ext4
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e=2E?=
- References:
- [PATCH 1/2] ext2/3: Support 2^32-1 blocks(Kernel)
- From: "Takashi Sato" <[email protected]>
- Re: [Ext2-devel] [PATCH 1/2] ext2/3: Support 2^32-1 blocks(Kernel)
- From: Mingming Cao <[email protected]>
- Re: [Ext2-devel] [PATCH 1/2] ext2/3: Support 2^32-1 blocks(Kernel)
- From: "Takashi Sato" <[email protected]>
- Re: [Ext2-devel] [PATCH 1/2] ext2/3: Support 2^32-1 blocks(Kernel)
- From: Andreas Dilger <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 1/2] ext2/3: Support 2^32-1 blocks(Kernel)
- Prev by Date: Re: Kernel Oops-jprobe
- Next by Date: Re: [patch] mspec - special memory driver and do_no_pfn handler
- Previous by thread: Re: [Ext2-devel] [PATCH 1/2] ext2/3: Support 2^32-1 blocks(Kernel)
- Next by thread: Re: [Ext2-devel] [PATCH 1/2] ext2/3: Support 2^32-1 blocks(Kernel)
- Index(es):