Re: puting task to TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE before adding it to an wait queue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2006-03-17 at 00:31 +0200, Yitzchak Eidus wrote:
> the function worker_thread in kernel 2.6.15.6  first put the task to
> TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE and only then add itself to an wait queue:
> 	set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
> 	while (!kthread_should_stop()) {
> 		add_wait_queue(&cwq->more_work, &wait);

See dusty old archives...

http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/9712.2/0545.html

<quote>
Anyway, the basic race-free wait loop looks like this (there are
variations, but this is one of the basic versions that you find in
various places):


if (should_wait_condition) {
add_wait_queue(..);
repeat:
current->state = TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE;
if (should_wait_condition) {
schedule();
goto repeat;
}
remove_wait_queue(..);
current->state = TASK_RUNNING;
}


There are only two important rules:
- you have to add yourself to the wait queue _before_ testing for the
condition.
- you have to mark yourself asleep _before_ testing for the condition.

</quote>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux