Re: [ANN] Squashfs 3.0 released

Hi Phillip,

On 17/03/06, Phillip Lougher <[email protected]> wrote:
> and in constrained
> block device/memory systems (e.g. embedded systems) where low
> overhead is
> needed."
>
> At the moment it tends to be used for embedded systems, and liveCDs.

>From the embedded side here...

Have you any idea how the performance of version 3.0 stack up against 2.1?

You haven't updated the readme.performance file yet :)

thanks

Samuel

ps Looking forward to seeing squashfs in main line soon :)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [ANN] Squashfs 3.0 released
    • From: Phillip Lougher <[email protected]>
  • Re: [ANN] Squashfs 3.0 released
    • From: Phillip Lougher <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [PATCH -rt, RFC] rid rcu_read_lock() and _unlock() of common-case atomics
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Add SA_PERCPU_IRQ flag support
• Previous by thread: Re: [ANN] Squashfs 3.0 released
• Next by thread: Re: [ANN] Squashfs 3.0 released
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]