On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 12:19:34PM -0600, Mark Maule wrote: > If there's objectins to having struct msi_ops declared in pci.h, then I guess > we need to come up with another solution. There are other transaction based interrupt subsystems that are typically arch specific (e.g. GSC device interrupts on PA-RISC). So far, MSI is the only generic one and that is clearly part of the PCI spec. grant - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- [PATCH] (-mm) drivers/pci/msi: explicit declaration of msi_register
- From: "Jun'ichi Nomura" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] (-mm) drivers/pci/msi: explicit declaration of msi_register
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] (-mm) drivers/pci/msi: explicit declaration of msi_register
- From: "Jun'ichi Nomura" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] (-mm) drivers/pci/msi: explicit declaration of msi_register
- From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] (-mm) drivers/pci/msi: explicit declaration of msi_register
- From: "Jun'ichi Nomura" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] (-mm) drivers/pci/msi: explicit declaration of msi_register
- From: Mark Maule <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] (-mm) drivers/pci/msi: explicit declaration of msi_register
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 10 of 20] ipath - support for userspace apps using core driver
- Next by Date: Re: [2.6.16-rc6] CONFIG_LOCALVERSION_AUTO
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] (-mm) drivers/pci/msi: explicit declaration of msi_register
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] (-mm) drivers/pci/msi: explicit declaration of msi_register
- Index(es):
 |