On Thu, 16 Mar 2006 08:29:51 PST, "Randy.Dunlap" said: > nah, the only place that using symbolic names for true and false > is a problem is when someone #defines or enums them bassackwards. Or goes off the deep end and does something like: enum bool = {false, true, unknown}; http://thedailywtf.com/forums/47844/ShowPost.aspx http://thedailywtf.com/forums/61792/ShowPost.aspx Gaak. Unfortunately, they might someday try to write kernel code. ;)
Attachment:
pgp2z0YFs6qsU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch 1/1] consolidate TRUE and FALSE
- From: "Joshua Hudson" <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 1/1] consolidate TRUE and FALSE
- References:
- [patch 1/1] consolidate TRUE and FALSE
- From: [email protected]
- Re: [patch 1/1] consolidate TRUE and FALSE
- From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 1/1] consolidate TRUE and FALSE
- From: "Randy.Dunlap" <[email protected]>
- [patch 1/1] consolidate TRUE and FALSE
- Prev by Date: Re: [RFC] Proposed manpage additions for ptrace(2)
- Next by Date: Re: Kernel Bug while trying to mount nfs share
- Previous by thread: Re: [patch 1/1] consolidate TRUE and FALSE
- Next by thread: Re: [patch 1/1] consolidate TRUE and FALSE
- Index(es):