Re: [PATCH] unshare: Cleanup up the sys_unshare interface before we are committed.

On Thu, 16 Mar 2006, Andrew Morton wrote:
> 
> iirc there was some discussion about this and it was explicitly decided to
> keep the CLONE flags.
> 
> Maybe Janak or Linus can comment?

My personal opinion is that having a different set of flags is more 
confusing and likely to result in problems later than having the same 
ones. Regardless, I'm not touching this for 2.6.16 any more, 

		Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] unshare: Cleanup up the sys_unshare interface before we are committed.
  - From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)

References:
- [PATCH] unshare: Cleanup up the sys_unshare interface before we are committed.
  - From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: [PATCH] unshare: Cleanup up the sys_unshare interface before we are committed.
  - From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Cache Aliasing
Next by Date: Re: nfs udp 1000/100baseT issue
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] unshare: Cleanup up the sys_unshare interface before we are committed.
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] unshare: Cleanup up the sys_unshare interface before we are committed.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]