Re: [PATCH] unshare: Cleanup up the sys_unshare interface before we are committed.

On Thu, 16 Mar 2006, Andrew Morton wrote:
> 
> iirc there was some discussion about this and it was explicitly decided to
> keep the CLONE flags.
> 
> Maybe Janak or Linus can comment?

My personal opinion is that having a different set of flags is more 
confusing and likely to result in problems later than having the same 
ones. Regardless, I'm not touching this for 2.6.16 any more, 

		Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] unshare: Cleanup up the sys_unshare interface before we are committed.
    • From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)

• References:
  • [PATCH] unshare: Cleanup up the sys_unshare interface before we are committed.
    • From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
  • Re: [PATCH] unshare: Cleanup up the sys_unshare interface before we are committed.
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Cache Aliasing
• Next by Date: Re: nfs udp 1000/100baseT issue
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] unshare: Cleanup up the sys_unshare interface before we are committed.
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] unshare: Cleanup up the sys_unshare interface before we are committed.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]