In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 10:08:20 -0800, Zachary Amsden wrote:
> Index: linux-2.6.16-rc5/include/asm-i386/mach-vmi/mach_processor.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.16-rc5.orig/include/asm-i386/mach-vmi/mach_processor.h 2006-03-10 13:03:35.000000000 -0800
> +++ linux-2.6.16-rc5/include/asm-i386/mach-vmi/mach_processor.h 2006-03-10 13:03:35.000000000 -0800
> @@ -0,0 +1,137 @@
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) 2005, VMware, Inc.
> + *
> + * All rights reserved.
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
> + * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
> + * (at your option) any later version.
> + *
> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but
> + * WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> + * MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, GOOD TITLE or
> + * NON INFRINGEMENT. See the GNU General Public License for more
> + * details.
> + *
> + * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
> + * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
> + * Foundation, Inc., 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
> + *
> + * Send feedback to [email protected]
> + *
> + */
> +
> +
> +#ifndef _MACH_PROCESSOR_H
> +#define _MACH_PROCESSOR_H
> +
> +#include <vmi.h>
> +
> +static inline void vmi_cpuid(const int op, int *eax, int *ebx, int *ecx, int *edx)
> +{
> + vmi_wrap_call(
> + CPUID, "cpuid",
> + XCONC("=a" (*eax), "=b" (*ebx), "=c" (*ecx), "=d" (*edx)),
> + 1, "a" (op),
> + VMI_CLOBBER(FOUR_RETURNS));
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Generic CPUID function
> + */
> +static inline void cpuid(int op, int *eax, int *ebx, int *ecx, int *edx)
> +{
> + vmi_cpuid(op, eax, ebx, ecx, edx);
> +}
> +
> +
> +/* Some CPUID calls want 'count' to be placed in ecx */
> +static inline void cpuid_count(int op, int count, int *eax, int *ebx, int *ecx,
> + int *edx)
> +{
> + asm volatile(""::"c"(count));
> + vmi_cpuid(op, eax, ebx, ecx, edx);
> +}
You can't assume those last two statements will stay together.
>From the gcc 4.0.2 info file:
> <...> you can't expect a sequence of volatile `asm' instructions
> to remain perfectly consecutive. If you want consecutive output, use a
> single `asm'.
Maybe you could make vmi_cpuid always take a 'count' param, then just make cpuid
do:
vmi_cpuid(op, 0, eax, ebx, ecx, edx);
and cpuid_count do:
vmi_cpuid(op, count, eax, ebx, ecx, edx);
(And sorry about trimming the cc: but I'm reading from a digest and that list
is too long to enter manually.)
--
Chuck
"Penguins don't come from next door, they come from the Antarctic!"
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
