* Lee Revell <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-03-15 at 22:15 -0500, Bill Rugolsky Jr. wrote:
> >
> > I'm heading home now (it's 22:00, and I've been here 16 hours
> > already), but I figured that I'd post what I have thus far, and
> > perhaps you can tell me what the problem is.
> >
>
> I think it would be better to try to identify the exact circumstances
> that trigger the large PIO delay, than to start over debugging a new
> and untested driver, especially if the SMM hypothesis has been ruled
> out.
well, but it's nevertheless a nice thing that the driver got enhanced -
and Bill's patch seems to be quite close to usable. If that driver
enhancement also ends up solving the latency then why not?
one more thing to try (in the old driver) would be to surround the inb()
line in the offending function with mcount(); calls, and redo the
latency trace. That will tell us for sure whether it's the PIO
instruction that causes the delay.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
