Re: Which kernel is the best for a small linux system?

[Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>]

On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 11:57:12PM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> >
> >On another denx.de page I found this summary (so you do not have to
> >visit the page):
> ># slow to build: 2.6 takes 30...40% longer to compile
> 
> A side effect of all the new optimizations that went into gcc since 2.95,
> I would say.

If you would have had a quick look at the results on the webpage you are 
commenting on instead of blindly speculating, you'd have known that your 
statement is bullshit since both the 2.4 and the 2.6 compiles were done 
using gcc 3.3.3.

> Jan Engelhardt

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/