Re: [2.6 patch] crypto/aes.c: array overrun

On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 08:54:48AM +1000, David McCullough wrote:
>  
>  struct aes_ctx {
>  	int key_length;
> -	u32 E[60];
> -	u32 D[60];
> +	u32 _KEYS[120];
>  };

Looks good.  Thanks for this David.

Could you please change the name from _KEYS to buf and patch the x86-64
version as well?

Cheers,
-- 
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[email protected]>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [2.6 patch] crypto/aes.c: array overrun
    • From: David McCullough <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [2.6 patch] crypto/aes.c: array overrun
    • From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
  • Re: [2.6 patch] crypto/aes.c: array overrun
    • From: Herbert Xu <[email protected]>
  • Re: [2.6 patch] crypto/aes.c: array overrun
    • From: [email protected]
  • Re: [2.6 patch] crypto/aes.c: array overrun
    • From: David McCullough <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Document Linux's memory barriers [try #4]
• Next by Date: Re: Which kernel is the best for a small linux system?
• Previous by thread: Re: [2.6 patch] crypto/aes.c: array overrun
• Next by thread: Re: [2.6 patch] crypto/aes.c: array overrun
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]