On Tue, 14 Mar 2006, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Esben Nielsen <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> [...]
> no. We have to run deadlock detection to avoid things like circular lock
> dependencies causing an infinite schedule+wakeup 'storm' during priority
> boosting. (like possible with your wakeup based method i think)
No, all tasks would just settle on the highest priority and then the
wakeups would stop.
Esben
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
