On 3/14/06, Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-03-14 at 04:27 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > I thought that was unnecessary if the struct members are ordered such
> > that compiler would not add padding?
>
> the rules for when padding gets added are different for each platform
> though; worst case of adding it is that it serves as documentation that
> the layout matters :)
I thought the worst case of adding it is that GCC produces awful code
when accessing structure members for __attribute__((packed)) items[1].
Maybe -Wpadded would be better?
[1] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=108829229128091
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
