On Mon, 13 Mar 2006, Zachary Amsden wrote: > There is a Signed-off-by line on every patch I send out, You're right. It was just the first 1/24 that was missing it, it was there in the second copy. > But most importantly, I really don't understand how it is possible to > make a patch to the Linux kernel and not release it under GPL. This can really only be done if the person posting the patch does not have the right to release the code. This is what the Signed-off-by lines are for, IIRC. -- All Rights Reversed - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/24] VMI i386 Linux virtualization interface proposal
- From: Zachary Amsden <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/24] VMI i386 Linux virtualization interface proposal
- References:
- [RFC, PATCH 0/24] VMI i386 Linux virtualization interface proposal
- From: Zachary Amsden <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/24] VMI i386 Linux virtualization interface proposal
- From: Anthony Liguori <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/24] VMI i386 Linux virtualization interface proposal
- From: Zachary Amsden <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/24] VMI i386 Linux virtualization interface proposal
- From: Rik van Riel <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/24] VMI i386 Linux virtualization interface proposal
- From: Zachary Amsden <[email protected]>
- [RFC, PATCH 0/24] VMI i386 Linux virtualization interface proposal
- Prev by Date: Re: does swsusp suck after resume for you? [was Re: Faster resuming of suspend technology.]
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] [PNP] 'modalias' sysfs export
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/24] VMI i386 Linux virtualization interface proposal
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/24] VMI i386 Linux virtualization interface proposal
- Index(es):
 |