Hi,
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 04:13:10PM +1100, Con Kolivas wrote:
> Since my warning probably scared anyone from actually trying this patch I've
> given it a thorough working over on my own laptop, booting with mem=128M. The
> patch works fine and basically with the patch after resuming from disk I have
> 25MB more memory in use with pages prefetched from swap. This makes a
> noticeable difference to me. That's a pretty artificial workload, so if
> someone who actually has lousy wakeup after resume could test the patch it
> would be appreciated.
I did try it, but ran into weird unrelated compile failures multiple times
(sorry, no log).
Andreas Mohr
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
