Andrew Morton wrote:
[email protected] (Jonathan Corbet) wrote:
If we don't want the tests, fine, but it might make sense to fix the
interface documentation, at least, to note that "tag" is not an
arbitrary integer value.
Sure, we can live with the runtime cost of a documentation fix ;)
How about making the code self-documenting and more useful at the same
time: put RADIX_TREE_TAGS in radix-tree.h, and call it RADIX_TREE_MAX_TAGS
--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
