Le 13.03.2006 15:00, Maneesh Soni a ?crit :
> On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 03:01:58PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
>>Laurent Riffard <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>Le 12.03.2006 12:10, Andrew Morton a ?crit :
>>> >
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.16-rc6/2.6.16-rc6-mm1/
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> This kernel hangs on boot while trying to activate logical
>>> volumes from initrd:
>>>
>>> ------------[ cut here ]------------
>>> kernel BUG at fs/sysfs/inode.c:180!
>>> invalid opcode: 0000 [#1]
>>> last sysfs file: /block/ram0/dev
>>> Modules linked in: dm_mirror dm_mod
>>> CPU: 0
>>> EIP: 0060:[<c0172e71>] Not tainted VLI
>>> EFLAGS: 00010246 (2.6.16-rc6-mm1 #123)
>>> EIP is at sysfs_get_name+0xd/0x46
>>> eax: c15a49c8 ebx: dfe2b988 ecx: dff254d8 edx: c15a49cc
>>> esi: dfe87b05 edi: dfe2b988 ebp: dfe67d28 esp: dfe67d28
>>> ds: 007b es: 007b ss: 0068
>>> Process vgchange (pid: 242, threadinfo=dfe67000 task=dfe175d0)
>>> Stack: <0>dfe67d44 c01738c3 dffdc4b4 c15a49c8 dfe2b988 ffffffef
dfe2b98d dfe67d60
>>> c0173dcd dff2a804 dfe2b984 dfe2b984 00000001 fffffffe
dfe67d74 c0173f3b
>>> dfe67d6c c15a84d4 dfe2b984 dfe67d90 c01a33fd c03242d0
00000004 dfe2b8f8
>>> Call Trace:
>>> [<c0103a31>] show_stack_log_lvl+0x8b/0x95
>>> [<c0103b69>] show_registers+0x12e/0x194
>>> [<c0103e62>] die+0x14e/0x1db
>>> [<c01040ba>] do_trap+0x7c/0x96
>>> [<c0104319>] do_invalid_op+0x89/0x93
>>> [<c01034db>] error_code+0x4f/0x54
>>> [<c01738c3>] sysfs_dirent_exist+0x1c/0x65
>>> [<c0173dcd>] create_dir+0x55/0x17d
>>> [<c0173f3b>] sysfs_create_dir+0x46/0x61
>>> [<c01a33fd>] kobject_add+0xa4/0x14c
>>> [<c017267e>] register_disk+0x4b/0xe9
>>> [<c019c28c>] add_disk+0x2e/0x3d
>>> [<e08198a5>] create_aux+0x27e/0x2d7 [dm_mod]
>>> [<e081991d>] dm_create+0xe/0x10 [dm_mod]
>>> [<e081c317>] dev_create+0x4a/0x239 [dm_mod]
>>> [<e081c18c>] ctl_ioctl+0x203/0x238 [dm_mod]
>>> [<c0156648>] do_ioctl+0x3c/0x4f
>>> [<c0156851>] vfs_ioctl+0x1f6/0x20d
>>> [<c0156892>] sys_ioctl+0x2a/0x44
>>> [<c01029bb>] sysenter_past_esp+0x54/0x75
>>> Code: 0b 30 01 72 85 28 c0 ff 06 31 db eb 07 89 f8 e8 d1 8d fe
ff 83 c4 10 89 d8 5b 5e 5f c9 c3 55 85 c0 89 e5 74 06 83 78 14 00 75
08 <0f> 0b b4 00 73 d3 28 c0 8b 50 18 83 fa 08 74 22 7f 0a 83 fa 02
>>
>>Thanks.
>>
>>Greg, can you please interpret this? What does this BUG:
>>
>>const unsigned char * sysfs_get_name(struct sysfs_dirent *sd)
>>{
>> struct attribute * attr;
>> struct bin_attribute * bin_attr;
>> struct relay_attribute * rel_attr;
>> struct sysfs_symlink * sl;
>>
>> if (!sd || !sd->s_element)
>> BUG();
>>
>>tell us?
>>
>
>
> I think here we have sd->s_element as NULL. This is probably due to
> my mistake in
>
>
gregkh-driver-sysfs-fix-problem-with-duplicate-sysfs-directories-and-files.patch
>
> NULL s_element which is used as cursor element is added to the s_children
> list in sysfs_dir_open() and is removed in sysfs_dir_close(). So if in
> between s_children is parsed, one can see sysfs_dirent with NULL
s_element.
>
> Please try the following patch on top of -mm1
>
>
> Thanks
> Maneesh
>
>
>
>
> o sysfs_dirent_exist() should ignore sysfs_dirent with NULL s_element
> as such element could have been added internally as cursor due to
> ->open() on parent directory.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maneesh Soni <[email protected]>
> ---
>
> linux-2.6.16-rc6-mm1-maneesh/fs/sysfs/dir.c | 12 +++++++-----
> 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff -puN fs/sysfs/dir.c~fix-sysfs-check-existing-sysfs_dirent
fs/sysfs/dir.c
> ---
linux-2.6.16-rc6-mm1/fs/sysfs/dir.c~fix-sysfs-check-existing-sysfs_dirent 2006-03-13 14:48:34.000000000
+0530
> +++ linux-2.6.16-rc6-mm1-maneesh/fs/sysfs/dir.c 2006-03-13
15:01:32.934811856 +0530
> @@ -63,11 +63,13 @@ int sysfs_dirent_exist(struct sysfs_dire
> struct sysfs_dirent * sd;
>
> list_for_each_entry(sd, &parent_sd->s_children, s_sibling) {
> - const unsigned char * existing = sysfs_get_name(sd);
> - if (strcmp(existing, new))
> - continue;
> - else
> - return -EEXIST;
> + if (sd->s_element) {
> + const unsigned char * existing = sysfs_get_name(sd);
> + if (strcmp(existing, new))
> + continue;
> + else
> + return -EEXIST;
> + }
> }
>
> return 0;
> _
>
Ok, with this one, it works fine.