On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 19:01 -0300, j4K3xBl4sT3r wrote: > so, in the case of the big footprints, might I use a 2.4.x instead of > 2.6.x just to avoid memory leaks and performance loss? Simply using more memory than a previous version is not a memory leak. Lee - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Which kernel is the best for a small linux system?
- From: Grant Coady <gcoady@gmail.com>
- Re: Which kernel is the best for a small linux system?
- References:
- Which kernel is the best for a small linux system?
- From: j4K3xBl4sT3r <jakexblaster@gmail.com>
- Re: Which kernel is the best for a small linux system?
- From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
- Re: Which kernel is the best for a small linux system?
- From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
- Re: Which kernel is the best for a small linux system?
- From: Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis@embeddedalley.com>
- Re: Which kernel is the best for a small linux system?
- From: j4K3xBl4sT3r <jakexblaster@gmail.com>
- Which kernel is the best for a small linux system?
- Prev by Date: Re: More than 8 CPUs detected and CONFIG_X86_PC cannot handle it on 2.6.16-rc6
- Next by Date: [2.6 patch] sound/: fix some memory leaks
- Previous by thread: Re: Which kernel is the best for a small linux system?
- Next by thread: Re: Which kernel is the best for a small linux system?
- Index(es):
 |