RE: [future of drivers?] a proposal for binary drivers.

> Hi, David.
>
> You seem to have misspelled, "I am not a lawyer. Please seek the
> advice of a
> competent attorney experienced in copyright law in your
> jurisdiction instead
> of listening to my uninformed blather."
>

	I will thank you not to put words in my mouth. If you wish to express your
own opinion, and even your own opinion of my opinion, you may do so. But
implying that your opinions are my own is out of line. Even rude.

	DS


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: [future of drivers?] a proposal for binary drivers.
    • From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: [future of drivers?] a proposal for binary drivers.
    • From: Matt Reuther <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Exports for hrtimer APIs
• Next by Date: Re: Which kernel is the best for a small linux system?
• Previous by thread: Re: [future of drivers?] a proposal for binary drivers.
• Next by thread: RE: [future of drivers?] a proposal for binary drivers.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]