Re: Which kernel is the best for a small linux system?

On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 19:27 +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> # latencies up to 80% slower

This is certainly bullshit, it has not been true since 2.6.7 or so.

Did not visit the page but that list smells like they are selling
something.

Lee

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Which kernel is the best for a small linux system?
    • From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Which kernel is the best for a small linux system?
    • From: j4K3xBl4sT3r <[email protected]>
  • Re: Which kernel is the best for a small linux system?
    • From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
  • Re: Which kernel is the best for a small linux system?
    • From: Sam Ravnborg <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Semantics of smp_mb() [was : Re: [PATCH] Fix RCU race in access of nohz_cpu_mask ]
• Next by Date: [PATCH] Serial: proper support for Exar 16L580/16L2550/16L2552/16V2550/16V2552 UARTs
• Previous by thread: Re: Which kernel is the best for a small linux system?
• Next by thread: Re: Which kernel is the best for a small linux system?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]