> I'm still a bit surprised, since in the rest of the kernel we are even
> going from -O2 to -Os for getting better performance.
>
> Robert said he wanted to post some numbers showing that -O3 is
> measurably better for you [1], but I haven't seen them.
As you might have guessed, I kind of forgot about this (I was swamped
with unrelated stuff.) I'll try get someone else here at PathScale to
get these numbers.
Regards,
Robert.
--
Robert Walsh Email: [email protected]
PathScale, Inc. Phone: +1 650 934 8117
2071 Stierlin Court, Suite 200 Fax: +1 650 428 1969
Mountain View, CA 94043.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
