Re: [PATCH 18 of 20] ipath - kbuild infrastructure

> I'm still a bit surprised, since in the rest of the kernel we are even 
> going from -O2 to -Os for getting better performance.
> 
> Robert said he wanted to post some numbers showing that -O3 is 
> measurably better for you [1], but I haven't seen them.

As you might have guessed, I kind of forgot about this (I was swamped
with unrelated stuff.)  I'll try get someone else here at PathScale to
get these numbers.

Regards,
 Robert.

-- 
Robert Walsh                                 Email: [email protected]
PathScale, Inc.                              Phone: +1 650 934 8117
2071 Stierlin Court, Suite 200                 Fax: +1 650 428 1969
Mountain View, CA 94043.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH 0 of 20] [RFC] ipath driver - another round for review
    • From: "Bryan O'Sullivan" <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH 18 of 20] ipath - kbuild infrastructure
    • From: "Bryan O'Sullivan" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 18 of 20] ipath - kbuild infrastructure
    • From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [patch 1/4] natsemi: Add support for using MII port with no PHY
• Next by Date: Re: Semantics of smp_mb() [was : Re: [PATCH] Fix RCU race in access of nohz_cpu_mask ]
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 18 of 20] ipath - kbuild infrastructure
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 18 of 20] ipath - kbuild infrastructure
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]