Re: [patch] Require VM86 with VESA framebuffer

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Chuck Ebbert <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [patch] Require VM86 with VESA framebuffer
From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 18:01:58 +0100
Cc: Alan Cox <[email protected]>, Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>, Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>, Andrew Morton <[email protected]>, linux-kernel <[email protected]>, Antonino Daplas <[email protected]>, Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201)

Chuck Ebbert wrote:

In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>

On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 14:44:56 +0000, Alan Cox wrote:

VESA does not require VM86 so this change is completely wrong.


What is this all about then?

that is about X requiring it. Not about anything kernel related.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch] Require VM86 with VESA framebuffer
  - From: Jesse Barnes <[email protected]>

References:
- Re: [patch] Require VM86 with VESA framebuffer
  - From: Chuck Ebbert <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: Patch: MSI-K8T-Neo2-Fir OnboardSound and additional Soundcard
Next by Date: Re: 2.6.16-rc6-mm1: BUG at fs/sysfs/inode.c:180
Previous by thread: Re: [patch] Require VM86 with VESA framebuffer
Next by thread: Re: [patch] Require VM86 with VESA framebuffer
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]

Powered by Linux