Re: [future of drivers?] a proposal for binary drivers.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jan Knutar wrote:

On Wednesday 08 March 2006 23:28, Tim Tassonis wrote:

OS/2 died exactly because software companies didn't write closed-source software, hardware companies didn't write closed-source drivers, and IBM couldn't write it all themselves.

I read somewhere that the development kit was obscenely expensive and
effectively locked out all hobbyists and small companies.

IBM stuff may have been expensive.
There was gcc for os/2 though, which was nice for hobbyists.
The way I remember it, drivers wasn't the big problem.  The lack of drivers
could have become a problem if the lack of software was solved.  But it
wasn't - no need to drive a device for which you don't have an app . . .

Having gcc meant one could port some gpl software, which usually
originated on linux or other unixes.  But using such software on
linux was always easier, and so I switched os.

Helge Hafting
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux